‘Just not true:' Former Kennedy Center president responds to Trump's allegations of mismanagement

A federal court struck down President Trump s reciprocal tariffs in a ruling out Wednesday A three-judge panel on the Court of International Deal explained President exceeded any authority granted by the International Exigency Economic Powers Act The suit was brought on behalf of five U S -based businesses that rely on imports A federal court ruled Wednesday that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority with his reciprocal tariffs dealing a blow to a major tenet of the president s economic agenda A three-judge panel at the U S Court of International Exchange ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act a law that Trump invoked to justify the tariffs does not authentically give the president the power to unilaterally implement the sweeping duties The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs the judges wrote in their ruling The Trafficking Tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders they continued Dow futures jumped points on news of the ruling Implementing tariffs typically requires congressional approval but Trump chose to sidestep Congress by declaring a national economic urgency and using the purported urgency as justification for invoking the tariffs on his own The Trump administration swiftly appealed the ruling Wednesday to the U S Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Foreign countries nonreciprocal remedy of the United States has fueled America s historic and persistent pact deficits White House spokesperson Kush Desai revealed in a announcement after the order These deficits have created a national crisis that has decimated American communities left our workers behind and weakened our defense industrial base facts that the court did not dispute It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national crisis Desai added Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield one of the lead plaintiffs in the development called the ruling a supremacy not just for Oregon but for working families small businesses and everyday Americans President Trump s sweeping tariffs were unlawful reckless and economically devastating Rayfield commented in a declaration late Wednesday They triggered retaliatory measures inflated prices on essential goods and placed an unfair burden on American families small businesses and manufacturers Vince McMahon sex trafficking situation co-defendant John Laurinaitis agrees to help accuserTrump to pardon reality TV stars convicted of fraud and tax evasion Absurd Judge blasts Trump executive order targeting top law firmWalmart fined for shipping realistic toy guns to New York violating state lawTrump threatens CA federal funding over transgender athleteTrump administration moves to cut rest of Harvard contracts with federal governmentNPR sues Trump over executive order cutting federal fundingTrump delays tariffs on EU to July The ruling and subsequent Trump administration appeal likely set up a bitter legal battle that could wind up at the Supreme Court The suit was brought on behalf of five U S businesses that rely on imports from the U S to selected extent The judges reported that Trump s tariff orders were unlawful as to all not just the plaintiffs so there would be no question here of narrowly tailored relief The judges ordered the challenged tariffs to be vacated and their operation permanently enjoined Trump stated on April sweeping reciprocal tariffs on imports from nations around the world ranging from to Days later on April he issued a -day pause but kept in place the baseline tariffs on greater part products entering the country One of the issues the three-judge panel took with Trump s tariff regime was that the they did not see a clear connection between the purported crisis that Trump was using to justify tariffs and what tariffs really do in practice For example the judges singled out Trump s early tariffs on Canada and Mexico and tariff on China The tariffs were necessary Trump had argued at the time because the countries had failed to arrest seize detain or otherwise intercept drugs and drug traffickers But the judges located that there was no clear link between the president s stated goal namely cutting international drug trafficking and the method Trump was using to pursue it charging import duties on legal exchange Customs s collection of tariffs on lawful imports does not evidently relate to foreign governments efforts to arrest seize detain or otherwise intercept bad actors within their respective jurisdictions they wrote This is developing news Please refresh for updates